Demystifying the viva

Our School of Education Research conference keynote on 9th May is entitled:

Demystifying the viva
Professor Peter Hartley will talk about common problems that doctoral students experience with the viva examination, and suggest strategies for overcoming these. This will include a demonstration of a recent software to help students prepare for the viva through a mock version carried out on a computer.

As part of the build up to the event we have asked doctoral graduates at the school of education to offer their insights on how they completed their viva. Check out the posts on the other blog

Follow the conference discussion via #leedseducation

Doctoral genres 2 - abstracts

Reblogged from Dimitrina Kaneva:

The second post in the Doctoral Genres writing series with Ibrar Bhatt (http://ibrarspace.net) will be on abstracts for conferences as these is an integral part of the professional development of PhD students. I chose this topic as I have been working on several abstracts in the past couple of months so I wanted to share my experiences with the differences and similarities among them.

Read more… 655 more words

Dimitrina Kaneva has done a post as part of our shared 'doctoral genres' series. It's on the genre of 'abstracts' and the subsequent presentation/publishing that goes with it. Thanks Dimi :-)

Scallops paper by Michel Callon (1986)

Reblogged from University of Leeds Theory Group:

Click to visit the original post

In this session we discussed Michel Callon’s paper on “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation”.

What was interesting for me immediately when reading this article is that it is methodological. Callon presents the four ‘moments of translation’ in the construction of his story of a team of marine biologists who attempt to raise scallops on artificial reefs on the French coast.

Read more… 240 more words

In this session we discussed Michel Callon’s paper on “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation”.

Notes on ‘context’

Here are some notes from our discussion at the Leeds University Theory Group meeting today:

checkerboad-mesa-zion-sandstone-strata

Paper discussed

Edwards R (2009) Introduction: Life as a Learning Context? In: Edwards Richard, Biesta Gert, Thorpe Mary (ed.). Rethinking Contexts for Learning and Teaching: Communities, Activites and Networks, Abingdon, Oxon, U.K.: Routledge (of Taylor & Francis), pp. 1-13.

Discussion notes
In this chapter Edwards addresses “the problem of context” (Lave, 1996: p.5), and poses the question that “[i]f learning is lifelong and lifewide, what specifically then is a learning context?” (Edwards, 2009: p.2). He brings in the geological metaphor of “strata” to serve as a basis for arguing that learning can occur in a range of distributed ‘contexts’ and associational orders.

 
All contexts, therefore, are potentially learning contexts, and if we attune our attention to the social and material relations, or arrangements, which give rise to learning across different strata of people’s lives then we can begin to “lose the conceptual basis for talking specifically of a learning context” (p.2).

 
I was interested in asking: what really is an ‘off task’ activity in education, once we move beyond the dramaturgy of formal learning? As even sleeping is a part of the training regimen for many athletes, so what of learning?

 
The theoretical framing of Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) is one way of escaping the confines of a ‘context-as-container’ approach to learning, as are the frameworks of communities of practice (Lave and Wenger, 1991), and complexity (Haggis, 2007). But to change the very notion of context is a wholly different matter. And it is here where Edwards draws from a material-semiotic approach to do this (Latour, 1993), as well as other influences.

 
In the meeting we talked about the reframing of the notion of ‘context’ in relation to learning, and how we make the best of pedagogic interventions with this framing; is it simply to allow learners opportunities to ‘(re)contextualise’ pedagogic content?

 
In my own research on digital literacy events, I’m exploring how learners mobilise the literacy practices of their personal and social lives into a classroom situation, and write assignments for their course using the connectivity of cyberspace. ‘Context’ is important to me as I don’t think it’s enough to say that learners ‘migrate’ or ‘transfer’ some of their vernacular literacy practices from one context to another. Edwards’ metaphors of ‘folding’ and ‘scrumpled geography’ certainly shed some light on how a context emerges through a socio-material arrangement. Where does learning fit in to this? And how do we maximise opportunities for it?

References
Edwards R (2009) ‘Introduction: Life as a Learning Context?’ In: Edwards Richard, Biesta Gert, Thorpe Mary (ed.). Rethinking Contexts for Learning and Teaching: Communities, Activites and Networks, Abingdon, Oxon, U.K.: Routledge (of Taylor & Francis), pp. 1-13.

 
Haggis, T. (2007) ‘Conceptualizing the case in adult and higher education research: a dynamic systems view’, in J. Bogg and R. Geyer (Eds) Complexity, Science and Society, Oxford: Radcliff.

 
Latour, B. (1993) We Have Never Been Modern, Harlow: Harvester Wheatcheaf.

 
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 
Lave, J. (1996) ‘The practice of learning’, in S. Chaiklin and J. Lave (Eds) (1996) Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Original post

Doctoral genres 1 – the upgrade

Been discussing with Dimi Kaneva (http://dkaneva.wordpress.com) about the idea of doing some posts on the different genres that a doctoral student needs to master. This is because we agreed that it’s not just about doing the thesis, writing papers, etc. but that a doctoral student should also write for non-academic audiences to ensure wider ‘impact’, engage in dissemination strategies, etc.

This first post is about the upgrade, or ‘transfer’, process. Timely since I just completed mine successfully :-)

The document submitted as part of an upgrade or transfer process in a doctorate is a
particular genre of writing that is sometimes underplayed by doctoral students. As a genre, it represents, among other things, a cogent proposal of your doctorate, its potential implications, and the context of your study. When done effectively, it’s a great way to conceptualise your study: the what, why, how, and so what of it. It addresses why your project is a worthwhile doctoral study, and why YOU are the one who should carry it out.

It can also be accompanied by a pilot study in which you may have tested certain
aspects of your data collection instruments in the field, and analytical methodologies, an upgrade ‘viva’, and a timetable of work.

In dealing with this genre, one of the important things to remember is to set out a clear and cogent reasoning of the claims of the study. Every doctorate should have a ‘claim’ or series of claims, which then ‘anchor’ the thesis. Set out the theoretical space, and methodological approach clearly, and tell the story of your research intentions, your work so far, and what you want to do. Don’t ‘over egg the pudding’ as you can always elaborate in the upgrade viva, and the thesis.

Also, structure this document well, with sections and signposting throughout. It should
read such that an educated person in a related discipline can understand the genesis of your research, and its claims. If you use jargon, then gloss it thoroughly.

If done well, the upgrade document will inspire the chapters of your thesis :-)

Notes from session on Bakhtin and Vygotsky

Reblogged from University of Leeds Theory Group:

I chose the article about 'dialectic versus dialogic' by R. Wegerif because I like to combine ideas of both Bakhtin and Vygotsky and worry that this article is saying it conflicts ontologically to do so.
I realised that I have been using Wertsch's idea about learning being dialogue with 'voices' and had lost track of where this idea had come from.

Read more… 549 more words

vyg15               Some reflections on the theory group session on Bakhtin and Vygotsky...

Meetings schedule Winter/Spring 2013

Reblogged from University of Leeds Theory Group:

Great news! Here is a schedule for the next few months (Winter/Spring 2013)
Meetings to be held in the School of Education, University of Leeds, Hillary Place, G03.a

Thursday 24 January, 4:00 - 5:00
Dialogic vs dialectic

Valerie Farnsworth (School of Education) to facilitate discussion of the following reading:
Wegerif, R (2008) Dialogic or Dialectic? The significance of ontological assumptions in research on Educational Dialogue.

Read more… 346 more words

Meetings schedule for SofE theory group meetings
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,505 other followers