Bhatt, I. & Samanhudi, U. (2022). From academic writing to academics writing: Transitioning towards literacies for research productivity. International Journal of Educational Research, 111, DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101917

MacKenzie, A., Rose, J. & Bhatt, I. (2021). The Epistemology of Deceit in a Postdigital Era: Dupery by Design, Springer, Series: Postdigital Science & Education. See https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-72154-1

MacKenzie, A. & Bhatt, I. (2021) ‘Bad Faith, Bad Politics, Bad Consequences: The Epistemic Harms of Online Deceit’. In MacKenzie, A., Rose, J. & Bhatt, I. (Eds.) The Epistemology of Deceit in a Postdigital Era: Dupery by Design, Springer, pp. 3-20, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72154-1_1 see here

MacKenzie, A., Bhatt, I. & Rose, J. (2021) ‘Introduction: The Genesis of Dupery by Design’. In MacKenzie, A., Rose, J. & Bhatt, I. (Eds.) The Epistemology of Deceit in a Postdigital Era: Dupery by Design, Springer, p. xvii-xxiii. see https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bfm%3A978-3-030-72154-1%2F1.pdf

MacKenzie, A., Bhatt, I. & Rose, J. (2021) ‘Conclusion: Some Resolutions to Dupery and the Power of Online Platforms’. In MacKenzie, A., Rose, J. & Bhatt, I. (Eds.) The Epistemology of Deceit in a Postdigital Era: Dupery by Design, Springer, pp. 283-288. see https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bbm%3A978-3-030-72154-1%2F1.pdf

MacKenzie, A., et al (2021). Dissolving the Dichotomies between Online and Campus-Based Teaching: A Collective Response to The Manifesto for Teaching Online (Bayne et al. 2020), Postdigital Science and Education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00259-z

MacKenzie, A., Rose, J. & Bhatt, I. (2020). Dupery by Design: The Epistemology of Deceit in a Postdigital Era, Postdigital Science and Education. 2, 2 DOI: 10.1007/s42438-020-00114-7

MacKenzie, A. & Bhatt, I. (2020). Opposing the power of lies, bullshit and fake news: the value of truth, Postdigital Science and Education. 2, 1, p. 217-232 DOI: 10.1007/s42438-019-00087-2

MacKenzie, A. & Bhatt, I. (2020). Lies, Bullshit and Fake News: A Consideration of Their Epistemic Vices [Editorial], Postdigital Science & Education, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0025-4

Reader, J. et al. (2020) Enchantment – Disenchantment-Re-Enchantment: Postdigital Relationships between Science, Philosophy, and Religion, Postdigital Science and Education. 3, pp. 934–965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00133-4

Bhatt, I. & MacKenzie, A. (2019). Just Google it! Digital Literacy and the epistemology of Ignorance, Teaching in Higher Education [special issue on “Experts, knowledge and criticality in the age of ‘alternative facts’: re-examining the contribution of higher education”], Vol 24:3, pp. 302-317, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1547276 [link]

Khan, S. & Bhatt, I. (2019). ‘Curation’. In Hobbs, R. & Mihailidis, P. (eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Media Literacy. NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118978238.ieml0047

MacKenzie, A. & Bhatt, I. (2019). Lies, Bullshit and Fake News: Some Epistemological Concerns, Postdigital Science & Education, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0025-4

Tusting, K., McCulloch, S. Bhatt, I. Hamilton, M. & Barton, D. (2019). The Dynamics of Knowledge Creation: Academics Writing in the the Contemporary University. Routledge. [research monograph]

Bhatt, I. (2017). Assignments as controversies: digital literacy and writing in classroom practice, Routledge Research in Literacy. New York: Routledge. [research monograph]

Bhatt, I. (2017). ‘Classroom digital literacies as interactional accomplishments’. In Researching New Literacies: Design, Theory, and Data in Sociocultural Investigation, Knobel, M. and Lankshear, C. (eds.), New York: Peter Lang. pp. 127-149 [link]

Bhatt, I, de Roock, R & Adams, J. (2015). Diving deep into digital literacy: emerging methods for research, Language and Education, Vol. 29 (6) pp. 477-492, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2015.1041972

de Roock, R., Bhatt, I. and Adams, J. (2015). ‘Video analysis in digital literacy studies: Exploring innovative methods’. In Digital Methods for Social Sciences: An Interdisciplinary guide to research innovation, Snee, H., Hine, C., Morley, Y., Roberts, S. & Watson, H. (eds.), Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 105-121. [link]

Bhatt, I. and de Roock, R. (2013). Capturing the Sociomateriality of Digital Literacy Events, Research in Learning Technology, Special Issue: Scholarship and Literacies in a Digital Age, Vol. 21 (4) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21.21281 Note: this paper is sometimes cited as ‘2014’ but it actually belongs to the 2013 volume]

Bhatt, I. (2012). Digital literacy practices and their layered multiplicity, Educational Media Internationaldoi: 10.1080/09523987.2012.741199, Vol. 49 (4), pp. 289-301. [Journal article]


“New media, digital literacy and the mechanics of trust” University World News, January 25 2020, available at: https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20200122075758703

“What’s the point of education if Google can tell us anything?” The Conversation, July 24 2015, available at: https://theconversation.com/whats-the-point-of-education-if-google-can-tell-us-anything-44441 [Trans: French, German, Korean]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s