The following are some tweets from the SRHE’s Digital University conference on “The digital and the material: mapping contemporary student practices” on 28th March 2014. Tweets are related to my session and other sessions by David White, Donna Lanclos, Lesley Gourlay, and Martin Oliver. Some thought provoking themes were discussed.
True dat. (Also, hi y'all!) RT @DonnaLanclos: multiplicity of spaces, cross-cutting spaces, always under construction #srhe @lesleygourlay
— Maura Smale (@mauraweb) March 28, 2014
Much like Bigfoot, I am difficult to capture in motion RT@AlisonGilmour: @DonnaLanclos Mapping spaces #srhe pic.twitter.com/tTCRsKciPV
— Donna Lanclos (@DonnaLanclos) March 28, 2014
Now @DonnaLanclos is talking about 'the visibility of the digital' in a library context. #srhe
— David White (@daveowhite) March 28, 2014
#srhe @daveowhite's word 'eventedness' describes the connection between people arising through co-presence at an event – can be lost online
— Charlotte Webb (@otheragent) March 28, 2014
The digital and the material – not a dichotomy/ opposite/ separate. #srhe
— Alison Gilmour (@AlisonGilmour) March 28, 2014
No such thing as a learning space. Students have a learning landscape. Can't assume students will be in any one space. @DonnaLanclos #srhe
— Julian Beckton (@julianbeckton) March 28, 2014
If I'm sitting in the library, interacting on twitter, where is my 'learning space'? #hypothetical #thinking #srhe
— Jane Davis (@JaneDavis13) March 28, 2014
@DonnaLanclos See Gilmore’s work and @entropologie on sub-rosa digital literacies #srhe
— Ibrar Bhatt, PhD (@ibrar_bhatt) March 28, 2014
Learning space as epistemological interconnectivity? #thinking #srhe
— Jane Davis (@JaneDavis13) March 28, 2014
@linguistics12 is publishing scheduled tweets as he speaks – hogging two spatiotemporal modes – impressive 🙂 #shre
— Charlotte Webb (@otheragent) March 28, 2014
I examine & problematise the impact of cyberspace on classroom digital use through exploring how assignments get done #srhe
— Ibrar Bhatt, PhD (@ibrar_bhatt) March 28, 2014
The deployment of digital tools in classrooms contributes to new assemblages; new literacy practices instantiate them #srhe
— Ibrar Bhatt, PhD (@ibrar_bhatt) March 28, 2014
"the dramaturgy of formal learning" @linguistics12 #srhe
— Donna Lanclos (@DonnaLanclos) March 28, 2014
Choreography of learning practice(s), dramaturgy and digital literacy via @linguistics12 – interesting themes #srhe #phdchat
— Jane Davis (@JaneDavis13) March 28, 2014
Reconceptualizing literacy requires rethinking of methods @linguistics12 #srhe
— Donna Lanclos (@DonnaLanclos) March 28, 2014
Sociomateriality is an ontological theme today – @linguistics12 @lesleygourlay #srhe
— Jane Davis (@JaneDavis13) March 28, 2014
Good #EdTech is that which allows users to harness the ‘literacies’ of their personal lives as resources #digilit #srhe
— Ibrar Bhatt, PhD (@ibrar_bhatt) March 28, 2014
@linguistics12 screencaptures writing and all of the other things that happen around writing #srhe
— Donna Lanclos (@DonnaLanclos) March 28, 2014
really fun methodological rigor by @linguistics12 #srhe
— Donna Lanclos (@DonnaLanclos) March 28, 2014
#srhe maybe useful to think of devices themselves as spaces with their own architectures – e.g. iphone forces particular behaviour?
— Charlotte Webb (@otheragent) March 28, 2014
@otheragent Yes! Hardware and software are part of the very assemblages being explored #srhe
— Ibrar Bhatt, PhD (@ibrar_bhatt) March 28, 2014
All the devices come out, not just the ones you think they will work with @linguistics12 #srhe
— Donna Lanclos (@DonnaLanclos) March 28, 2014
#shre @linguistics12: paradigmatic and methodological radicality are co-dependent
— Charlotte Webb (@otheragent) March 28, 2014
@linguistics12 #srhe are new research ethics demands brought about through use of screencapture and high def cameras?
— Charlotte Webb (@otheragent) March 28, 2014
@otheragent Absolutely yes. A whole new bunch of ethical issues: an unobtrusive but invasive method! #srhe
— Ibrar Bhatt, PhD (@ibrar_bhatt) March 28, 2014
.@linguistics12 has lovely visual field notes #srhe
— Donna Lanclos (@DonnaLanclos) March 28, 2014
College policies can permit certain kinds of digital literacies and discourage others #srhe
— Julian Beckton (@julianbeckton) March 28, 2014
Safeguarding as driver -> RT @julianbeckton: College policies can permit certain kinds of digital literacies and discourage others #srhe
— Jane Davis (@JaneDavis13) March 28, 2014
.@linguistics12 talks about the agency of the algorithm @aasher #srhe
— Donna Lanclos (@DonnaLanclos) March 28, 2014
@DonnaLanclos @linguistics12 @aasher & notes that Google practically structures students' assignments
— Charlotte Webb (@otheragent) March 28, 2014
Levi-Strauss! #bricolage #anthropology #ftw @linguistics12 #srhe
— Donna Lanclos (@DonnaLanclos) March 28, 2014
Excellent presentation by Ibrar Bhatt @linguistics12 #srhe ANT analysis of student assignments
— Lesley Gourlay (@lesleygourlay) March 28, 2014
I want to do a mashup of @linguistics12 's venn diagrams with the #vandr mapping #srhe
— Donna Lanclos (@DonnaLanclos) March 28, 2014
#srhe @linguistics12 Search engine's algorithms as much an actor in information retrieval as the user. Well, not equal, but influential
— Julian Beckton (@julianbeckton) March 28, 2014
love the idea of "anarchic bricolage"–whose tribute band is that? #srhe
— Donna Lanclos (@DonnaLanclos) March 28, 2014
digital and physical "keys" held by people who can then gatekeep student access to digital and physical spaces @linguistics12 #srhe
— Donna Lanclos (@DonnaLanclos) March 28, 2014
The matryoshka doll of practices/tasks/literacies @linguistics12 #srhe
— Donna Lanclos (@DonnaLanclos) March 28, 2014
Digital media is disruptive but also ‘irruptive’: wild & feral digital literacies ‘flow’ into classroom where they prev could not #srhe
— Ibrar Bhatt, PhD (@ibrar_bhatt) March 28, 2014
digital literacy structures from institutions = tree structure, but actual practices more like rhizomes @linguistics12 #srhe
— Donna Lanclos (@DonnaLanclos) March 28, 2014
Worries me that there is no mention of college obligations wrt safeguarding when considering 'keys and barriers' @linguistics12 #srhe
— Jane Davis (@JaneDavis13) March 28, 2014
VLE learning often needs support from keyholders (e.g. ICT) Learners have to jump through hoops made by hoopmakers! @linguistics12 #srhe
— Julian Beckton (@julianbeckton) March 28, 2014
In the dominant ontological politics of the classroom there is no place for certain digital literacy practices #srhe 1/2..
— Ibrar Bhatt, PhD (@ibrar_bhatt) March 28, 2014
..1/2 and there remains a clear hierarchical distinction between ‘curricular’ usage of digital media and ‘social’ usage of it #srhe
— Ibrar Bhatt, PhD (@ibrar_bhatt) March 28, 2014
#srhe Ibrar @linguistics12 thank you for your fascinating talk on sociomaterial account on how assignments get done pic.twitter.com/VJMx2zXvpJ
— Federica Oradini (@federicaoradini) March 28, 2014
"Students use illegitimate practices that work really well, they hide from the institution" @daveowhite on the inter-panel #srhe
— Annette Webb (@NodWebb) March 28, 2014
#srhe Panel discussion at The digital and the material: mapping contemporary student practices event @daveowhite pic.twitter.com/f7Kzh6FUjs
— Federica Oradini (@federicaoradini) March 28, 2014
Finally home from #srhe the Digital and the Material seminar. Excellent day with four thought provoking presentations and good discussion.
— Julian Beckton (@julianbeckton) March 28, 2014
Still basking in the glow of the fun conversations we had at #srhe yesterday. Good stuff, y'all @lesleygourlay @daveowhite @linguistics12
— Donna Lanclos (@DonnaLanclos) March 29, 2014
@DonnaLanclos @lesleygourlay @linguistics12 #srhe yeah, you-all. 🙂
— David White (@daveowhite) March 29, 2014
Categories: Lectures, Research, Technologies
Tagged as: ANT, digital literacies, events, lectures, material considerations, sociomateriality
Ibrar's space 